Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in South Carolina, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 4,480

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in South Carolina totaled $76,688,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1Haigler Farms PartnershipCameron, SC 29030$989,379
2Arbor One Aca **Florence, SC 29502$762,038
3Prestage Farms Of Sc LLCCamden, SC 29021$750,000
4Williams Farms PartnershipIslandton, SC 29929$727,647
5Walter P Rawl & Sons, IncPelion, SC 29123$708,594
6Nimmer Turf And Tree Farm IncRidgeland, SC 29936$650,000
7Satterwhite Farms LLCNewberry, SC 29108$543,198
8Seaside Farm IncSt. Helena Island, SC 29920$509,200
9Coosaw Ag LLCFairfax, SC 29827$500,000
10Clayton Rawl Farms IncLexington, SC 29072$500,000
11Jerrold A Watson And Sons, LLCMonetta, SC 29105$500,000
12Lemaster Livestock IncGaffney, SC 29341$500,000
13J W Yonce & Sons IncJohnston, SC 29832$500,000
14Carolina Enterprises Of The Lowcountry LLCLexington, SC 29072$495,000
15Manchester Farms IncColumbia, SC 29209$439,961
16Oak III FarmsSummerton, SC 29148$419,745
17Rogers Brothers FarmHartsville, SC 29550$404,626
18Titan Fruit & Vegetable Co IncRidge Spring, SC 29129$376,752
19Bruce G Price & SonsLittle Rock, SC 29567$374,651
20Modern Turf IncRembert, SC 29128$336,467

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>


Farm Subsidies Education