Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in South Carolina, 2020

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,509

Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in South Carolina totaled $13,259,000 in in 2020.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program
2020
1Arbor One Aca **Florence, SC 29502$1,290,798
2Ag South Farm Credit Aca **Douglas, GA 31534$386,339
3Farm Services Agency **Washington, DC 20250$319,655
4Connelly FarmsUlmer, SC 29849$132,355
5J-ray Farms Of South Carolina General PartnershipMayesville, SC 29104$124,844
6Tolson FarmsLynchburg, SC 29080$104,793
7Chappell PartnershipBarnwell, SC 29812$90,385
8H E & J B Shuler & SonsHolly Hill, SC 29059$90,059
9Kelley Farms PartnershipOlanta, SC 29114$81,273
10Mcintosh BrothersPinewood, SC 29125$69,552
11Oak III FarmsSummerton, SC 29148$69,465
12Four J Family FarmsPinewood, SC 29125$67,989
13Infinger Farms PartnershipSaint George, SC 29477$67,423
14Sharp And Sharp Certified Seed Dba Sharp And SharpAllendale, SC 29810$67,365
15Rogers Brothers FarmHartsville, SC 29550$61,046
16C & S Farms LLCLynchburg, SC 29080$60,977
17Bruce G Price & SonsLittle Rock, SC 29567$60,707
18Billy BentonHartsville, SC 29550$54,868
19Dantzler Farms PartSantee, SC 29142$54,419
20Tomlinson Farms Of Lynchburg LLCLynchburg, SC 29080$53,161

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag