Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in South Carolina, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,644
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in South Carolina totaled $4,505,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Billy Benton | Hartsville, SC 29550 | $15,808 |
42 | Frank & Cheryle Rogers | Blenheim, SC 29516 | $15,788 |
43 | Glasdrum Farms | Little Rock, SC 29567 | $15,445 |
44 | Oneal Farms | Society Hill, SC 29593 | $15,180 |
45 | Green & Mims LLC | Lynchburg, SC 29080 | $15,111 |
46 | Springville Farms LLC | Darlington, SC 29540 | $15,023 |
47 | Synovus Bank ** | Statesboro, GA 30459 | $14,948 |
48 | Norwood Floyd Farms LLC | Lake City, SC 29560 | $14,917 |
49 | M E White Farms LLC | Timmonsville, SC 29161 | $14,594 |
50 | Baker Bros. Farm, Inc. | Monroe, NC 28112 | $14,362 |
51 | Robert T Windham | Lamar, SC 29069 | $14,216 |
52 | Johnson Brothers Farm Of Hartsville, Sc LLC | Hartsville, SC 29550 | $14,207 |
53 | Doyle W Oneal | Darlington, SC 29540 | $14,091 |
54 | David E Watts III Farms | Lake City, SC 29560 | $14,009 |
55 | Thomas G Chaplin | Hartsville, SC 29550 | $13,755 |
56 | Oneal Planting Co | Blenheim, SC 29516 | $13,538 |
57 | Cole Norwood | Darlington, SC 29532 | $13,484 |
58 | F B Farms | Scranton, SC 29591 | $13,369 |
59 | Gonzales' Land & Timber LLC | Columbia, SC 29201 | $13,254 |
60 | Chappell Partnership | Barnwell, SC 29812 | $13,187 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”