Total Disaster Programs in Calhoun County, South Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 314
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Calhoun County, South Carolina totaled $8,468,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Edward M Rast | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $65,931 |
42 | Kym Farm Inc | Elloree, SC 29047 | $65,693 |
43 | W K Pooser Jr | Cameron, SC 29030 | $64,594 |
44 | Roger L Hill | Gaston, SC 29053 | $59,774 |
45 | Michael P Shirer | Cameron, SC 29030 | $58,157 |
46 | William T Dantzler | Cameron, SC 29030 | $54,821 |
47 | H Heath Hill | Eastover, SC 29044 | $53,703 |
48 | Jefferson L Gates | Cameron, SC 29030 | $53,276 |
49 | Jeffrey Legree Kaigler | Swansea, SC 29160 | $52,811 |
50 | Donnie B Porth Farm | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $52,566 |
51 | Simpson Sikes | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $51,848 |
52 | Rawl Dargan Culclasure III | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $51,747 |
53 | Jeffrey W. Moore | North, SC 29112 | $50,790 |
54 | Haigler Farms Partnership | Cameron, SC 29030 | $49,699 |
55 | T R Stowe | Wytheville, VA 24382 | $49,414 |
56 | Edward M Rast Jr | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $45,926 |
57 | Lee Blackman Jr | Elloree, SC 29047 | $44,383 |
58 | Douglas E Spigner | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $43,946 |
59 | Jesse D Shirer Jr | Cameron, SC 29030 | $43,187 |
60 | Gl&t LLC | Columbia, SC 29201 | $37,594 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”