Total Disaster Programs in Calhoun County, South Carolina, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 304
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Calhoun County, South Carolina totaled $8,191,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Lyons Brothers Farms | Elloree, SC 29047 | $345,247 |
2 | Harry L Ott Jr | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $299,548 |
3 | Knowlton R Stabler | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $270,783 |
4 | Sims Moorer | Cameron, SC 29030 | $251,921 |
5 | Arbor One Aca ** | Florence, SC 29502 | $233,998 |
6 | Kendall Wannamaker | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $233,065 |
7 | James M Sikes Jr | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $219,636 |
8 | W M Smith & Sons | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $207,630 |
9 | Curtis Russell Dukes | St Matthews, SC 29135 | $204,239 |
10 | Mary Lil Wannamaker | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $200,128 |
11 | William P Buyck | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $177,330 |
12 | H Heath Hill And Son | Eastover, SC 29044 | $161,873 |
13 | Lang Syne Farm | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $154,835 |
14 | Perrow Farms | Cameron, SC 29030 | $153,130 |
15 | John H Inabinet Farms | Orangeburg, SC 29118 | $145,658 |
16 | John Steven Wiles | Elloree, SC 29047 | $144,068 |
17 | J Cecil Moore Jr | North, SC 29112 | $139,200 |
18 | Oak Lane Farm | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $133,820 |
19 | William M Shirer III | Cameron, SC 29030 | $130,345 |
20 | John Olson III | Saint Matthews, SC 29135 | $127,631 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>