Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Calhoun County, South Carolina, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 28

Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Calhoun County, South Carolina totaled $200,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Environmental Quality Incentives Program
1995-2021
1Kendall WannamakerSaint Matthews, SC 29135$68,187
2Michael DrakeSaint Matthews, SC 29135$18,327
3William C Holman JrCameron, SC 29030$17,106
4John O WiengesSaint Matthews, SC 29135$11,409
5John Olson IIISaint Matthews, SC 29135$9,879
6Bates Houck FarmCameron, SC 29030$8,764
7T And T LLCVance, SC 29163$7,491
8Melvin D Robinson JrSaint Matthews, SC 29135$6,707
9William Shirer FarmsCameron, SC 29030$6,198
10Larry O Shealy JrSaint Matthews, SC 29135$5,910
11James B WannamakerSwansea, SC 29160$5,903
12Oak Lane FarmSaint Matthews, SC 29135$4,504
13Jeffrey Legree KaiglerSwansea, SC 29160$3,453
14Wheel Of Fortune RanchSaint Matthews, SC 29135$3,448
15John W HaneFort Motte, SC 29135$3,300
16Mary R PittmanFort Motte, SC 29135$3,204
17Frank M Wannamaker JrHilton Head Island, SC 29928$3,096
18Rawl Dargan Culclasure IIISaint Matthews, SC 29135$3,090
19Carolyn P WiengesSaint Matthews, SC 29135$2,818
20Bates R HouckCameron, SC 29030$2,648

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag