Emergency Conservation Program in Charleston County, South Carolina, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 19 of 19
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Charleston County, South Carolina totaled $108,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Charleston Vegetable Company LLC | Stockton, MD 21864 | $18,550 |
2 | John B Walpole | Wadmalaw Island, SC 29487 | $12,160 |
3 | Jac Inc | Yonges Island, SC 29449 | $12,131 |
4 | King Brothers | Yonges Island, SC 29449 | $8,657 |
5 | Tony C Garvin | Adams Run, SC 29426 | $8,037 |
6 | John G Murray Dvm | Edisto Island, SC 29438 | $6,982 |
7 | Freeman Farms Oliver W Freeman | Johns Island, SC 29455 | $6,616 |
8 | Leonard L Newton | Yonges Island, SC 29449 | $6,019 |
9 | Joseph Fields | Johns Island, SC 29455 | $5,344 |
10 | Michael B Rawl | Edisto Island, SC 29438 | $5,107 |
11 | Jane L East | Columbia, SC 29212 | $3,821 |
12 | Too Goo Doo Farms, Inc. | Meggett, SC 29449 | $2,816 |
13 | Thomas C Garvin Jr | Adams Run, SC 29426 | $2,720 |
14 | Thomas Johnson | Johns Island, SC 29455 | $2,112 |
15 | Ralph R Baughman | Hollywood, SC 29449 | $2,020 |
16 | William E Walpole | Wadmalaw Island, SC 29487 | $1,920 |
17 | William L Sires | Yonges Island, SC 29449 | $1,480 |
18 | Osgood D Hamlin Jr | Mt Pleasant, SC 29466 | $780 |
19 | Wonderlyn L B Pinckney | Mc Clellanville, SC 29458 | $757 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”