Total Conservation Programs in Chesterfield County, South Carolina, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 102
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Chesterfield County, South Carolina totaled $136,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | E A Freeman Family Lp | Chesterfield, SC 29709 | $9,042 |
2 | Richard M Ammons | Marshville, NC 28103 | $8,847 |
3 | Ralph And Lavaughn Mccaskill Family Trust | Bethune, SC 29009 | $7,235 |
4 | Ann Miller Brainard | Monroe, NC 28112 | $6,972 |
5 | Thomas B Laney Trust | Cheraw, SC 29520 | $5,664 |
6 | Reginald D Gaddy Jr | Monroe, NC 28112 | $3,988 |
7 | Bobby T Simpson | Jefferson, SC 29718 | $3,831 |
8 | Lois A Poole | Chesterfield, SC 29709 | $3,405 |
9 | Eustacia R Hinton | Mount Ulla, NC 28125 | $3,083 |
10 | Dorothy B Pusser | Chesterfield, SC 29709 | $3,015 |
11 | Elizabeth O Miles | Ruby, SC 29741 | $2,612 |
12 | Jackson Oil Co Inc | Cheraw, SC 29520 | $2,605 |
13 | Betty H Teal | Chesterfield, SC 29709 | $2,503 |
14 | Jean J Ellis | Saint Simons Island, GA 31522 | $2,228 |
15 | Sox Farms Inc | Mc Bee, SC 29101 | $2,207 |
16 | Hoyet W Page | Chesterfield, SC 29709 | $2,136 |
17 | Linda C Lake | Prosperity, SC 29127 | $2,099 |
18 | Blue Wing Plantation LLC | Blenheim, SC 29516 | $2,080 |
19 | David Taylor | Chapin, SC 29036 | $1,798 |
20 | R & L Timber Company LLC | Ruby, SC 29741 | $1,791 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>