Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Clarendon County, South Carolina, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 138
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Clarendon County, South Carolina totaled $1,264,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Arbor One Aca ** | Florence, SC 29502 | $182,515 |
2 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $83,752 |
3 | Oak III Farms | Summerton, SC 29148 | $69,465 |
4 | Mcintosh Brothers | Pinewood, SC 29125 | $45,111 |
5 | Justice Farms Of North Carolina, LLC | Roanoke, VA 24011 | $39,598 |
6 | David L Tindal Farms LLC | Pinewood, SC 29125 | $38,246 |
7 | Lester C Thompson III | Manning, SC 29102 | $32,549 |
8 | Brogdon Family Farms | Manning, SC 29102 | $31,326 |
9 | Stacy W Whetsell | Manning, SC 29102 | $27,631 |
10 | John H Horton III | Manning, SC 29102 | $26,559 |
11 | W L Coker | Alcolu, SC 29001 | $26,218 |
12 | Thomas Elam Lee | Alcolu, SC 29001 | $25,772 |
13 | Scott H Jackson Jr | Manning, SC 29102 | $22,866 |
14 | Lewis Brothers Farm | Paxville, SC 29102 | $22,601 |
15 | Cecil B Eaddy | Manning, SC 29102 | $21,484 |
16 | Triple S Farms Of Sc, LLC | Manning, SC 29102 | $20,501 |
17 | James Paul Eaddy | Manning, SC 29102 | $19,930 |
18 | Cecil Bozard Eaddy Jr | Manning, SC 29102 | $19,115 |
19 | Four J Family Farms | Pinewood, SC 29125 | $18,400 |
20 | William R Simpson Sr | Manning, SC 29102 | $17,605 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>