Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments in Darlington County, South Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 48
Recipients of Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments from farms in Darlington County, South Carolina totaled $432,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Doyle W Oneal | Darlington, SC 29540 | $78,146 |
2 | Springville Farms LLC | Darlington, SC 29540 | $59,457 |
3 | Tolson Farms | Lynchburg, SC 29080 | $47,060 |
4 | Arbor One Aca ** | Florence, SC 29502 | $37,277 |
5 | Kathy A Windham | Lamar, SC 29069 | $26,844 |
6 | Sugar Hill Acres LLC | Hartsville, SC 29550 | $19,872 |
7 | Tom Smith Farms LLC | Hartsville, SC 29550 | $15,071 |
8 | Robert T Windham | Lamar, SC 29069 | $12,211 |
9 | Johnson Brothers Farm Of Hartsville, Sc LLC | Hartsville, SC 29550 | $10,634 |
10 | Ricky James | Darlington, SC 29532 | $10,605 |
11 | C Kelly Windham | Lamar, SC 29069 | $9,624 |
12 | Woodard Farms Inc | Darlington, SC 29540 | $8,604 |
13 | Robbie Windham | Lamar, SC 29069 | $7,459 |
14 | R Hoyt Campbell | Hartsville, SC 29550 | $6,119 |
15 | Thomas G Chaplin | Hartsville, SC 29550 | $5,471 |
16 | M E White Farms LLC | Timmonsville, SC 29161 | $5,349 |
17 | Dargan Farms Partnership | Darlington, SC 29540 | $4,682 |
18 | Ty Woodard | Florence, SC 29501 | $4,491 |
19 | Oneal Farms | Society Hill, SC 29593 | $4,225 |
20 | Craig Gandy | Darlington, SC 29540 | $4,134 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>