Farm Subsidy information
Edgefield County, South Carolina
Total Subsidies in Edgefield County, South Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 88
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Edgefield County, South Carolina totaled $9,629,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Titan Fruit & Vegetable Co Inc | Ridge Spring, SC 29129 | $201,899 |
2 | Hickory Hill Dairy LLC | Edgefield, SC 29824 | $105,083 |
3 | Mountain View Farms Inc | Edgefield, SC 29824 | $54,857 |
4 | Edgefield Timber Inc | North Augusta, SC 29860 | $52,875 |
5 | Harry W Miller Jr | Edgefield, SC 29824 | $36,082 |
6 | Forrest Fruit Company LLC | Johnston, SC 29832 | $27,892 |
7 | Richard A Miller Jr | Edgefield, SC 29824 | $21,613 |
8 | Derrick Farms | Johnston, SC 29832 | $17,654 |
9 | Ricky L Spradley | Warrenville, SC 29851 | $15,426 |
10 | James David Miller | Edgefield, SC 29824 | $13,144 |
11 | W G Smith III | Johnston, SC 29832 | $12,884 |
12 | Clark Forrest | Charleston, SC 29407 | $12,186 |
13 | Gregg B Thomas | Johnston, SC 29832 | $9,987 |
14 | Williams Brothers Farm | Johnston, SC 29832 | $8,905 |
15 | Mckies Dairy LLC | North Augusta, SC 29860 | $6,857 |
16 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $6,689 |
17 | Joe C Yonce | Ridge Spring, SC 29129 | $6,090 |
18 | L&m Farms | Edgefield, SC 29824 | $5,768 |
19 | Michael Hammond | Johnston, SC 29832 | $4,396 |
20 | Carolina Farms & Harvesting Inc | Johnston, SC 29832 | $4,174 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>