Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Edgefield County, South Carolina, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 128
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Edgefield County, South Carolina totaled $825,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Titan Farms L L C | Ridge Spring, SC 29129 | $148,148 |
2 | Derrick Farms | Johnston, SC 29832 | $55,074 |
3 | J W Yonce & Sons Inc | Johnston, SC 29832 | $37,629 |
4 | Titan Peach Farms Inc | Ridge Spring, SC 29129 | $36,901 |
5 | Hickory Hill Farms | Edgefield, SC 29824 | $26,156 |
6 | Cooks Farm | Trenton, SC 29847 | $26,027 |
7 | Lewis F Holmes Farms | Johnston, SC 29832 | $24,184 |
8 | J H Satcher III | Johnston, SC 29832 | $23,774 |
9 | Hamp E Holmes Jr | Trenton, SC 29847 | $23,707 |
10 | W G Smith III | Johnston, SC 29832 | $16,331 |
11 | James M Forrest Jr | Ward, SC 29166 | $16,185 |
12 | James E Yonce | Johnston, SC 29832 | $15,753 |
13 | R W Dubose Ltd | Ridge Spring, SC 29129 | $15,000 |
14 | Joe C Yonce | Ridge Spring, SC 29129 | $14,061 |
15 | John Olin Berry | Johnston, SC 29832 | $13,756 |
16 | Cook's Poultry Farm Deleted | Trenton, SC 29847 | $13,277 |
17 | Frank Berry | Johnston, SC 29832 | $12,559 |
18 | J Michael Miller Dairy Farm | Edgefield, SC 29824 | $11,905 |
19 | Mckies Dairy LLC | North Augusta, SC 29860 | $11,416 |
20 | Vann Family Partnership | Trenton, SC 29847 | $11,284 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>