Farm Subsidy information
Florence County, South Carolina
Total Subsidies in Florence County, South Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 244
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Florence County, South Carolina totaled $7,870,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | J A M Enterprises Inc | Florence, SC 29505 | $5,586 |
82 | Robbie L Springs | Lake City, SC 29560 | $5,168 |
83 | Phillip Ward | Effingham, SC 29541 | $5,119 |
84 | Tyson Springs | Lake City, SC 29560 | $4,890 |
85 | Land-tec Usa, LLC | Florence, SC 29506 | $4,507 |
86 | Les Galloway | Darlington, SC 29532 | $4,463 |
87 | Conner Wade Poston | Pamplico, SC 29583 | $4,311 |
88 | Barry A Bazen | Pamplico, SC 29583 | $4,305 |
89 | Edward L Parnell Jr | Timmonsville, SC 29161 | $4,207 |
90 | Jay Poston | Johnsonville, SC 29555 | $3,787 |
91 | Ira S Rainwater III | Florence, SC 29501 | $3,739 |
92 | Steve A Stone | Johnsonville, SC 29555 | $3,517 |
93 | Chris Springs | Lake City, SC 29560 | $3,501 |
94 | Gary Mcclam Land Company LLC | Kingstree, SC 29556 | $3,336 |
95 | Thomas Bryant Huggins | Florence, SC 29505 | $3,263 |
96 | Timothy R Chandler | Lexington, SC 29072 | $3,233 |
97 | K & J Enterprises | Mayesville, SC 29104 | $3,132 |
98 | Grant Lyerly | Lake City, SC 29560 | $2,911 |
99 | John Scott Mcgill Iv | Kingstree, SC 29556 | $2,888 |
100 | Pinecroft LLC | Murrells Inlet, SC 29576 | $2,871 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”