Total Commodity Programs in Florence County, South Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 194
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Florence County, South Carolina totaled $2,455,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Arbor One Aca ** | Florence, SC 29502 | $389,273 |
2 | Gf Farms LLC | Lake City, SC 29560 | $110,294 |
3 | Triple P Farms | Johnsonville, SC 29555 | $109,284 |
4 | Patrick E Burch | Lake City, SC 29560 | $104,638 |
5 | James L Mccutcheon | Lake City, SC 29560 | $77,755 |
6 | Edward A Mccutcheon | Scranton, SC 29591 | $68,448 |
7 | Cane Branch Turf Farms LLC | Pamplico, SC 29583 | $62,730 |
8 | Ward Family Farms LLC | Timmonsville, SC 29161 | $62,419 |
9 | Daniel P Gause | Scranton, SC 29591 | $61,076 |
10 | Bartley Ray Poston | Pamplico, SC 29583 | $59,432 |
11 | F B Farms | Scranton, SC 29591 | $56,950 |
12 | Norwood Floyd Farms LLC | Lake City, SC 29560 | $53,448 |
13 | Alton L Cribb III | Effingham, SC 29541 | $48,507 |
14 | Marion J Turner | Pamplico, SC 29583 | $44,873 |
15 | Don Barry Baxley Sr | Johnsonville, SC 29555 | $41,338 |
16 | Don Barry Baxley Jr | Johnsonville, SC 29555 | $41,338 |
17 | Willard Dorriety Jr | Florence, SC 29501 | $40,752 |
18 | Dean Mckenzie | Lake City, SC 29560 | $36,724 |
19 | Dry Creek Farms Inc | Pamplico, SC 29583 | $34,113 |
20 | Andrew T Rodgers Jr | Scranton, SC 29591 | $33,652 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>