Total Disaster Programs in Georgetown County, South Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 31
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Georgetown County, South Carolina totaled $631,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Arbor One Aca ** | Florence, SC 29502 | $54,675 |
2 | Coastal Cutters Inc | Georgetown, SC 29440 | $52,875 |
3 | Britton Logging Inc | Georgetown, SC 29440 | $52,875 |
4 | Bay Area Forest Products LLC | Georgetown, SC 29440 | $52,875 |
5 | Smith Logging Inc | Andrews, SC 29510 | $52,875 |
6 | J.d. Trucking, Inc. | Andrews, SC 29510 | $52,875 |
7 | Bac Chipping Inc | Andrews, SC 29510 | $52,875 |
8 | Evon Rutledge Er Trucking | Andrews, SC 29510 | $43,541 |
9 | D&c Logging LLC | Georgetown, SC 29440 | $35,131 |
10 | Harold Singleton K&b Trucking Company | Georgetown, SC 29440 | $34,968 |
11 | Christopher Poston 24/7 Trucking LLC | Georgetown, SC 29440 | $28,506 |
12 | Altman Trucking LLC | Andrews, SC 29510 | $20,531 |
13 | Edward Holmes Jr Millions Transport LLC | Georgetown, SC 29440 | $17,398 |
14 | Mason Legrand Owens | Hemingway, SC 29554 | $10,825 |
15 | Andre Nesmith Aon Trucking | Georgetown, SC 29440 | $8,731 |
16 | C&p Trucking | Georgetown, SC 29440 | $7,854 |
17 | Pete Farms LLC | Hemingway, SC 29554 | $7,598 |
18 | Gerald Holmes | Hemingway, SC 29554 | $7,460 |
19 | Chad E Owens | Hemingway, SC 29554 | $6,893 |
20 | Phillip O Owens | Hemingway, SC 29554 | $6,088 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>