Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Lee County, South Carolina, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 104

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Lee County, South Carolina totaled $2,990,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
1Tolson FarmsLynchburg, SC 29080$302,348
2Barnes Farm PartnershipBishopville, SC 29010$204,084
3Tomlinson Farms Of Lynchburg LLCLynchburg, SC 29080$180,032
4Caughman And Son Farms LLCSumter, SC 29153$163,079
5Trey Rogers Farms LLCLamar, SC 29069$143,852
6C S Elmore/sonsBishopville, SC 29010$114,028
7Robert E Moore III Farms LLCHartsville, SC 29550$88,016
8Paul A HawkinsSumter, SC 29153$87,620
9Jordan FarmsBishopville, SC 29010$87,507
10Will J McelveenBishopville, SC 29010$78,328
11Agriservices Inc Of The Pee DeeHartsville, SC 29550$78,297
12David P AtkinsonLynchburg, SC 29080$73,701
13Smith FarmsBishopville, SC 29010$68,078
14Dog Island Farms IncBishopville, SC 29010$62,935
15Beasley Farms IncMayesville, SC 29104$62,932
16Ashwood Gin IncMayesville, SC 29104$59,644
17Ricky Atkinson Farm, LLCMayesville, SC 29104$55,240
18Charles A Beasley JrMayesville, SC 29104$54,757
19Billy SmithBishopville, SC 29010$54,310
20Charles A Beasley SrMayesville, SC 29104$54,175

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag