Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Lee County, South Carolina, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 204

Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Lee County, South Carolina totaled $6,196,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program
1995-2021
1Rogers Brothers FarmHartsville, SC 29550$290,256
2Tomlinson Farms Of Lynchburg LLCLynchburg, SC 29080$206,170
3Smith FarmsBishopville, SC 29010$198,053
4Tolson FarmsLynchburg, SC 29080$197,673
5J-ray Farms Of South Carolina General PartnershipMayesville, SC 29104$195,638
6Simpson Family FarmsMonroe, NC 28110$190,713
7C S Elmore/sonsBishopville, SC 29010$185,566
8Barnes Farm PartnershipBishopville, SC 29010$154,129
9Billy BentonHartsville, SC 29550$145,516
10Charles A Beasley JrMayesville, SC 29104$142,908
11Paul A HawkinsSumter, SC 29153$131,664
12Pete BeasleyBishopville, SC 29010$130,862
13Craven FarmsBishopville, SC 29010$124,984
14Jordan FarmsBishopville, SC 29010$124,775
15King Brothers FarmBishopville, SC 29010$117,102
16Green Acres Farm LLCMc Bee, SC 29101$114,953
17Joe & Joyce Atkinson FarmsBishopville, SC 29010$112,860
18Dog Island Farms IncBishopville, SC 29010$109,954
19Marion Scott FarmsLynchburg, SC 29080$108,620
20Charles A Beasley SrMayesville, SC 29104$101,515

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag