Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Lee County, South Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 135
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Lee County, South Carolina totaled $1,734,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Barnes Farm Partnership | Bishopville, SC 29010 | $191,520 |
2 | Arbor One Aca ** | Florence, SC 29502 | $102,530 |
3 | C S Elmore/sons | Bishopville, SC 29010 | $97,619 |
4 | Rogers Brothers Farm | Hartsville, SC 29550 | $95,805 |
5 | Tolson Farms | Lynchburg, SC 29080 | $75,893 |
6 | James B Johnson Jr | Hartsville, SC 29550 | $67,592 |
7 | Dog Island Farms Inc | Bishopville, SC 29010 | $48,141 |
8 | David P Atkinson | Lynchburg, SC 29080 | $43,424 |
9 | Jordan Farms | Bishopville, SC 29010 | $40,131 |
10 | Caughman And Son Farms LLC | Sumter, SC 29153 | $37,718 |
11 | Ag South Farm Credit Aca ** | Douglas, GA 31534 | $37,163 |
12 | Ashwood Gin Inc | Mayesville, SC 29104 | $32,596 |
13 | Charles A Beasley Sr | Mayesville, SC 29104 | $31,824 |
14 | Robert E Moore III Farms LLC | Hartsville, SC 29550 | $30,588 |
15 | Debra Mims | Sumter, SC 29153 | $29,479 |
16 | Tomlinson Farms Of Lynchburg LLC | Lynchburg, SC 29080 | $27,528 |
17 | Sunnydale Farms | Bishopville, SC 29010 | $27,312 |
18 | Players Stoney Run Farms Inc | Elliott, SC 29046 | $27,047 |
19 | Billy Smith | Bishopville, SC 29010 | $25,077 |
20 | Whit Player | Elliott, SC 29046 | $24,813 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>