Total Disaster Programs in Marlboro County, South Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 20
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Marlboro County, South Carolina totaled $392,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Calhoun Farms | Clio, SC 29525 | $179,260 |
2 | Troy Joseph Lillee Trucking LLC | Florence, SC 29501 | $47,441 |
3 | Oneal Planting Co | Blenheim, SC 29516 | $43,044 |
4 | L Evans Enterprises LLC | Bennettsville, SC 29512 | $36,774 |
5 | J Allan Mcdonald Farms | Tatum, SC 29594 | $13,037 |
6 | Joshua D Otuel | Bennettsville, SC 29512 | $11,539 |
7 | Douglas H & Margaret H Newton | Clio, SC 29525 | $10,814 |
8 | Arbor One Aca ** | Florence, SC 29502 | $9,361 |
9 | Evalyn T Otuel | Bennettsville, SC 29512 | $6,542 |
10 | Richard & Jane Rogers Farm | Bennettsville, SC 29512 | $5,943 |
11 | Glasdrum Farms | Little Rock, SC 29567 | $4,998 |
12 | Pat And Blake Rogers Farms | Blenheim, SC 29516 | $4,214 |
13 | Paul A Wallace III | Atlantic Beach, FL 32233 | $3,935 |
14 | T G Gibson Farms | Gibson, NC 28343 | $3,849 |
15 | Smith Farms | Bennettsville, SC 29512 | $3,704 |
16 | The Promise Land Stillwell Farms | Mc Coll, SC 29570 | $1,981 |
17 | W Ronald Quick | Bennettsville, SC 29512 | $1,611 |
18 | Donald Jeffrey Quick | Bennettsville, SC 29512 | $1,605 |
19 | William C Covington Jr | Clio, SC 29525 | $1,586 |
20 | William D Bethea | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $633 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>