Total Disaster Programs in Orangeburg County, South Carolina, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 77
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Orangeburg County, South Carolina totaled $1,371,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | R Barry Hutto | Holly Hill, SC 29059 | $21,209 |
22 | Phillip Bryson Williams | Neeses, SC 29107 | $21,060 |
23 | John L Crum | Orangeburg, SC 29115 | $20,926 |
24 | Morris O Rhodes | Rowesville, SC 29133 | $20,813 |
25 | Tommy Clark Stillinger | Neeses, SC 29107 | $20,105 |
26 | Ted Shuler & Sons | Santee, SC 29142 | $19,254 |
27 | Kimberly M Sweatman | Cope, SC 29038 | $19,253 |
28 | Nathaniel Rhodes | Rowesville, SC 29133 | $17,769 |
29 | James L Fanning Jr | Neeses, SC 29107 | $17,452 |
30 | Richard D Fogle | Neeses, SC 29107 | $15,722 |
31 | Laurie W Berry | Bowman, SC 29018 | $15,607 |
32 | Mclaurin Farms | Elloree, SC 29047 | $14,867 |
33 | Shuler Farms Poultry Inc. | Holly Hill, SC 29059 | $14,241 |
34 | Kenneth Griffith | Neeses, SC 29107 | $13,631 |
35 | Chick Castle LLC | Orangeburg, SC 29115 | $13,567 |
36 | Louis Berry | Bowman, SC 29018 | $12,300 |
37 | Gramling And Gramling LLC | Orangeburg, SC 29115 | $12,119 |
38 | , | $11,025 | |
39 | , | $10,998 | |
40 | Wesley H Shuler | Columbia, SC 29205 | $9,983 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”