Total Disaster Programs in Orangeburg County, South Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 107
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Orangeburg County, South Carolina totaled $1,810,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Russell Farms Part | Holly Hill, SC 29059 | $250,000 |
2 | Dantzler Farms Part | Santee, SC 29142 | $81,153 |
3 | Riley Farms | Orangeburg, SC 29115 | $55,270 |
4 | Mid Carolina Timber Co Inc | Orangeburg, SC 29116 | $52,875 |
5 | Travis Logging LLC | Bowman, SC 29018 | $52,875 |
6 | K & W Logging LLC | Neeses, SC 29107 | $52,875 |
7 | A&m Logging LLC | Neeses, SC 29107 | $52,875 |
8 | Rango Williams Logging LLC | North, SC 29112 | $52,875 |
9 | Tri County Timber, LLC. | Orangeburg, SC 29116 | $52,875 |
10 | Whitney L Ott Streamline Timber LLC | Orangeburg, SC 29118 | $52,875 |
11 | Arbor One Aca ** | Florence, SC 29502 | $49,518 |
12 | R Barry Hutto | Holly Hill, SC 29059 | $40,407 |
13 | Sara Boynton Hutto | Holly Hill, SC 29059 | $40,407 |
14 | Bms Transport Inc. | Eutawville, SC 29048 | $31,930 |
15 | Leeta B Holman | Cameron, SC 29030 | $31,309 |
16 | Jeffrey Legree Kaigler | Swansea, SC 29160 | $31,059 |
17 | Christopher Johnson | Springfield, SC 29146 | $30,391 |
18 | Gregg Covington Farms Partnership | Norway, SC 29113 | $29,892 |
19 | Harry & Thad Wimberly Dba Wimco | Bowman, SC 29018 | $27,614 |
20 | Infinger Farms Partnership | Saint George, SC 29477 | $26,921 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>