Total Commodity Programs in Orangeburg County, South Carolina, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 125
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Orangeburg County, South Carolina totaled $1,103,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Myers Dairy Farm | Bowman, SC 29018 | $7,130 |
42 | Landsdowne Dairy LLC | Bowman, SC 29018 | $6,597 |
43 | Tommy Clark Stillinger | Neeses, SC 29107 | $6,263 |
44 | Tampa Creek Farms LLC | North, SC 29112 | $5,412 |
45 | Winfield W Shecut | Cope, SC 29038 | $5,254 |
46 | R Barry Hutto | Holly Hill, SC 29059 | $4,726 |
47 | Sara Boynton Hutto | Holly Hill, SC 29059 | $4,726 |
48 | Chick Castle LLC | Orangeburg, SC 29115 | $4,705 |
49 | Lyons Brothers Farms | Elloree, SC 29047 | $4,240 |
50 | James Steve Mcalhany | Branchville, SC 29432 | $4,173 |
51 | K & S Farms | Swansea, SC 29160 | $4,024 |
52 | Holstein Farms LLC | North, SC 29112 | $3,624 |
53 | Sharpes Farm LLC | North, SC 29112 | $3,537 |
54 | J L Gramling Jr & Sons | Orangeburg, SC 29115 | $3,452 |
55 | J Hugh Knight | Orangeburg, SC 29115 | $3,445 |
56 | Bozard Farms LLC | Cameron, SC 29030 | $3,436 |
57 | James L Fanning Jr | Neeses, SC 29107 | $3,264 |
58 | Goodland LLC | Springfield, SC 29146 | $3,202 |
59 | Infinger Farms Partnership | Saint George, SC 29477 | $3,188 |
60 | Ronald W Weathers | Branchville, SC 29432 | $3,136 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”