Total Commodity Programs in Orangeburg County, South Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 282
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Orangeburg County, South Carolina totaled $6,473,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mclaurin Farms | Elloree, SC 29047 | $273,225 |
| 2 | Riley Farms | Orangeburg, SC 29115 | $236,011 |
| 3 | Gregg Covington Farms Partnership | Norway, SC 29113 | $217,313 |
| 4 | Ag South Farm Credit Aca ** | Douglas, GA 31534 | $216,287 |
| 5 | Willshire Farms Inc | Santee, SC 29142 | $190,031 |
| 6 | Dantzler Farms Part | Santee, SC 29142 | $190,012 |
| 7 | Strock Farms Partnership | Elloree, SC 29047 | $184,955 |
| 8 | Jameson Farms | Orangeburg, SC 29115 | $169,232 |
| 9 | Turf Connections Springfield LLC | Norway, SC 29113 | $158,023 |
| 10 | Alva W Dannelly Jr | Norway, SC 29113 | $153,091 |
| 11 | Ted Shuler & Sons | Santee, SC 29142 | $143,904 |
| 12 | Berry Dairy Farms LLC | Bowman, SC 29018 | $133,841 |
| 13 | Donald Allen Riddle | Norway, SC 29113 | $128,495 |
| 14 | Roy M Hungerpiller III | Cameron, SC 29030 | $124,977 |
| 15 | Bozard Farms LLC | Cameron, SC 29030 | $121,174 |
| 16 | Triple A Farms LLC | Bowman, SC 29018 | $121,124 |
| 17 | Drew Fogle | Neeses, SC 29107 | $115,748 |
| 18 | Hugo L Felkel Farm Estate | Elloree, SC 29047 | $112,513 |
| 19 | Traywick And Son Farm | Cope, SC 29038 | $97,032 |
| 20 | Triple G Farms LLC | Cope, SC 29038 | $96,482 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf