Farm Subsidy information

Orangeburg County, South Carolina

Total Subsidies in Orangeburg County, South Carolina, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,854

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Orangeburg County, South Carolina totaled $297,649,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2023
1Cotton Lane FarmsElloree, SC 29047$6,566,024
2Mckeowen FarmsOrangeburg, SC 29115$4,775,356
3Gregg Covington Farms PartnershipNorway, SC 29113$4,376,415
4Ted Shuler & SonsSantee, SC 29142$4,364,672
5Riley FarmsOrangeburg, SC 29115$3,841,582
6Kirby Brown & SonsSpringfield, SC 29146$3,489,395
7Russell Farms PartHolly Hill, SC 29059$3,193,015
8H E & J B Shuler & SonsHolly Hill, SC 29059$2,940,531
9Roy M Hungerpiller IIICameron, SC 29030$2,637,381
10Jameson FarmsOrangeburg, SC 29115$2,527,305
11Dantzler Farms PartSantee, SC 29142$2,356,116
12H Briggs Salley JrSalley, SC 29137$2,268,066
13Jjj FarmsOrangeburg, SC 29115$2,199,154
14Circle W FarmBowman, SC 29018$2,043,043
15Sublett Adolph Mcalhany JrBranchville, SC 29432$1,985,317
16Alva W Dannelly JrNorway, SC 29113$1,971,717
17Edward M Rast JrSaint Matthews, SC 29135$1,935,345
18Funchess Brothers FarmsRowesville, SC 29133$1,897,865
19Old Thompson FarmsVance, SC 29163$1,848,579
20J L Gramling Jr & SonsOrangeburg, SC 29115$1,793,816

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag