Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Orangeburg County, South Carolina, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 157
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Orangeburg County, South Carolina totaled $1,627,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Arbor One Aca ** | Florence, SC 29502 | $158,555 |
2 | Dantzler Farms Part | Santee, SC 29142 | $66,466 |
3 | Riley Farms | Orangeburg, SC 29115 | $58,895 |
4 | H E & J B Shuler & Sons | Holly Hill, SC 29059 | $56,475 |
5 | Strock Farms Partnership | Elloree, SC 29047 | $53,588 |
6 | Gregg Covington Farms Partnership | Norway, SC 29113 | $44,498 |
7 | Mclaurin Farms | Elloree, SC 29047 | $42,245 |
8 | Ted Shuler & Sons | Santee, SC 29142 | $38,045 |
9 | Jameson Farms | Orangeburg, SC 29115 | $36,632 |
10 | Alva W Dannelly Jr | Norway, SC 29113 | $36,197 |
11 | Russell Farms Part | Holly Hill, SC 29059 | $35,506 |
12 | Hutto Brothers Partnership | Holly Hill, SC 29059 | $29,360 |
13 | Willshire Farms Inc | Santee, SC 29142 | $28,049 |
14 | Bozard Farms LLC | Cameron, SC 29030 | $27,603 |
15 | Circle W Farm | Bowman, SC 29018 | $27,438 |
16 | Roy M Hungerpiller III | Cameron, SC 29030 | $26,190 |
17 | James H Bookhart | Elloree, SC 29047 | $24,029 |
18 | Seven Oaks Farm | North, SC 29112 | $22,622 |
19 | Harry & Thad Wimberly Dba Wimco | Bowman, SC 29018 | $21,998 |
20 | Traywick And Son Farm | Cope, SC 29038 | $20,873 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>