Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Orangeburg County, South Carolina, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 179
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Orangeburg County, South Carolina totaled $3,059,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Garrick Farms Inc | Cope, SC 29038 | $46,204 |
22 | James H Bookhart | Elloree, SC 29047 | $44,774 |
23 | Hutto Brothers Partnership | Holly Hill, SC 29059 | $40,030 |
24 | Nottoc Farm | Orangeburg, SC 29115 | $38,934 |
25 | Tilden F Riley III | Orangeburg, SC 29115 | $37,422 |
26 | Gunter Farms | Reevesville, SC 29471 | $35,070 |
27 | H Briggs Salley Jr | Salley, SC 29137 | $34,978 |
28 | Tracy C Sanders Jr | Springfield, SC 29146 | $31,526 |
29 | James Steve Mcalhany | Branchville, SC 29432 | $29,280 |
30 | Richard D Fogle | Neeses, SC 29107 | $28,872 |
31 | Funchess Brothers Farms | Rowesville, SC 29133 | $27,955 |
32 | Rita C Nance | North, SC 29112 | $27,108 |
33 | Seven Oaks Farm | North, SC 29112 | $25,756 |
34 | Goodland LLC | Springfield, SC 29146 | $22,099 |
35 | Russell Farms Part | Holly Hill, SC 29059 | $22,089 |
36 | Harry & Thad Wimberly Dba Wimco | Bowman, SC 29018 | $20,995 |
37 | Daniel Briggs Salley | Salley, SC 29137 | $19,819 |
38 | Holstein Farms LLC | North, SC 29112 | $19,099 |
39 | W H Bull | Cameron, SC 29030 | $19,038 |
40 | William H Bull Jr | Cameron, SC 29030 | $19,038 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”