Conservation Reserve Program in Spartanburg County, South Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 182
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Spartanburg County, South Carolina totaled $1,141,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Redland LLC | Spartanburg, SC 29302 | $44,315 |
2 | W C Anderson Jr | Woodruff, SC 29388 | $39,094 |
3 | J L Belue Farms LLC | Spartanburg, SC 29316 | $37,255 |
4 | John B Brockman Jr | Greer, SC 29651 | $35,392 |
5 | James Benson Page | Greenville, SC 29607 | $25,042 |
6 | Douglas A Stacey | Inman, SC 29349 | $25,022 |
7 | Robert Ledford | Chesnee, SC 29323 | $24,950 |
8 | David A Deese | Mauldin, SC 29662 | $24,045 |
9 | B W Stacey | Chesnee, SC 29323 | $22,390 |
10 | Claudette P Drummond | Fernandina Beach, FL 32034 | $22,337 |
11 | Jackie T Rogers | Woodruff, SC 29388 | $21,877 |
12 | Henry F Horton | Chesnee, SC 29323 | $21,633 |
13 | Charles A Grant | Spartanburg, SC 29307 | $20,124 |
14 | Thomas W Bonner | Chesnee, SC 29323 | $18,326 |
15 | H H Investments | Roebuck, SC 29376 | $17,886 |
16 | J L Belue & Son LLC | Spartanburg, SC 29316 | $17,111 |
17 | Sam W Page | Woodruff, SC 29388 | $16,213 |
18 | Roger Habisreutinger | Spartanburg, SC 29302 | $15,876 |
19 | William A Leonard Revocable Trust | Duncan, SC 29334 | $15,514 |
20 | Snow Enterprises LLC | Charlotte, NC 28216 | $15,252 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>