Farm Subsidy information

South Dakota

Total Subsidies in South Dakota, 2020

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 37,878

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in South Dakota totaled $2,023,000,000 in in 2020.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
2020
1Agrifund LLC **Amarillo, TX 79106$5,343,764
2Lindskov Ranch Gen PtrIsabel, SD 57633$2,484,932
3Yackley RanchesOnida, SD 57564$1,921,440
4Bon Homme Hutterian Brethren IncTabor, SD 57063$1,711,343
5Mayclin Farms PartnershipPlankinton, SD 57368$1,704,458
6Spring Creek Hutterian Brethren IncForbes, ND 58439$1,678,324
7Rockport Hutterian Brethren IncAlexandria, SD 57311$1,665,721
8Wagner FarmsMiller, SD 57362$1,651,582
9Gracevale Hutterian Brethren IncWinfred, SD 57076$1,628,179
10Shamrock Hutterian Brethren IncCarpenter, SD 57322$1,620,943
11Upland Htt Breth IncArtesian, SD 57314$1,617,626
12Modak Dairy IncGoodwin, SD 57238$1,604,954
13Hutterville South Dakota IncStratford, SD 57474$1,603,077
14Oaklane Hutterian BrethrenAlexandria, SD 57311$1,581,414
15Hammink Dairy LLCBruce, SD 57220$1,571,140
16Huron Hutterian Brethren IncHuron, SD 57350$1,564,876
17Cedar Grove Hutt Breth IncPlatte, SD 57369$1,554,803
18Shannon Hutterian BrethrenWinfred, SD 57076$1,543,130
19Collins Hutterian Brethren IncIroquois, SD 57353$1,537,744
20Lakeview Hutterian Brethren IncLake Andes, SD 57356$1,536,827

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag