Farm Subsidy information
South Dakota
Total Subsidies in South Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 103,000
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in South Dakota totaled $20,862,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Sd Building Authority | Sioux Falls, SD 57117 | $31,039,351 |
2 | Yackley Ranches | Onida, SD 57564 | $12,841,192 |
3 | River View Farms | Platte, SD 57369 | $11,237,682 |
4 | Wittler Joint Venture | Onida, SD 57564 | $10,094,316 |
5 | Three B Farms Partnership | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $9,396,081 |
6 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $9,274,231 |
7 | Mike Ogan Farms Partnership | Pierre, SD 57501 | $9,150,264 |
8 | Kenneth R Huse & Sons | Onida, SD 57564 | $8,946,990 |
9 | Lindskov Ranch Gen Ptr | Isabel, SD 57633 | $7,766,074 |
10 | Kjerstad Farm Partnership | Quinn, SD 57775 | $7,512,646 |
11 | Locken Farms | Bath, SD 57427 | $7,427,562 |
12 | Lower Brule Farm Corp | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $7,291,791 |
13 | Mayclin Farms Partnership | Plankinton, SD 57368 | $7,105,137 |
14 | Buhler & Buhler Enterprises | Onida, SD 57564 | $6,336,671 |
15 | Mundt Brothers | Agar, SD 57520 | $6,118,809 |
16 | Peterson Farms | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $6,065,307 |
17 | Sisseton-wahpeton Oyate | Agency Village, SD 57262 | $6,034,422 |
18 | Swenson Partnership | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $5,768,874 |
19 | Lnl Partnership | Pierre, SD 57501 | $5,735,626 |
20 | Jes Farms Partnership | Pierre, SD 57501 | $5,547,081 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>