Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in South Dakota, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 25,840
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in South Dakota totaled $553,982,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $1,630,850 |
| 2 | Lindskov Ranch Gen Ptr | Isabel, SD 57633 | $1,000,000 |
| 3 | Three B Farms Partnership | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $970,833 |
| 4 | Yackley Ranches | Onida, SD 57564 | $863,671 |
| 5 | Spring Creek Hutterian Brethren Inc | Forbes, ND 58439 | $750,000 |
| 6 | Bon Homme Hutterian Brethren Inc | Tabor, SD 57063 | $750,000 |
| 7 | Maxwell Hutterian Brethren | Scotland, SD 57059 | $750,000 |
| 8 | Upland Htt Breth Inc | Artesian, SD 57314 | $750,000 |
| 9 | Spring Valley Hutterian Brethren Inc | Wessington Springs, SD 57382 | $750,000 |
| 10 | Gracevale Hutterian Brethren Inc | Winfred, SD 57076 | $750,000 |
| 11 | Jamesville Hutterian Brethren Inc | Utica, SD 57067 | $750,000 |
| 12 | Oaklane Hutterian Brethren | Alexandria, SD 57311 | $750,000 |
| 13 | Evergreen Colony | Faulkton, SD 57438 | $750,000 |
| 14 | Modak Dairy Inc | Goodwin, SD 57238 | $750,000 |
| 15 | Rockport Hutterian Brethren Inc | Alexandria, SD 57311 | $750,000 |
| 16 | New Elm Spring Hutterian Brethren | Ethan, SD 57334 | $750,000 |
| 17 | Shamrock Hutterian Brethren Inc | Carpenter, SD 57322 | $750,000 |
| 18 | Lakeview Hutterian Brethren Inc | Lake Andes, SD 57356 | $750,000 |
| 19 | National Food Corporation | Everett, WA 98204 | $750,000 |
| 20 | Norfeld Hutterian Brethren | White, SD 57276 | $744,828 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf