Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Brule County, South Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 437
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Brule County, South Dakota totaled $16,701,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Foxley Brothers | Platte, SD 57369 | $624,543 |
| 2 | Pazour Family Feeders | Pukwana, SD 57370 | $316,399 |
| 3 | Olson Land & Livestock Inc | Platte, SD 57369 | $271,029 |
| 4 | Kroupa Ranch LLC | Kimball, SD 57355 | $262,644 |
| 5 | Cedar Grove Hutt Breth Inc | Platte, SD 57369 | $256,924 |
| 6 | Priebe Ag Ptn | Pukwana, SD 57370 | $235,720 |
| 7 | Bickner Farm LLC | Kimball, SD 57355 | $230,324 |
| 8 | Kroupa Pukwana Cattle LLC | Pukwana, SD 57370 | $210,980 |
| 9 | Jim Ketelhut | Pukwana, SD 57370 | $191,506 |
| 10 | Christensen Grain Farm Partnership | Chamberlain, SD 57325 | $167,619 |
| 11 | Holan Farms LLC | Kimball, SD 57355 | $147,471 |
| 12 | Rose L7 Ranch Inc | Chamberlain, SD 57325 | $146,808 |
| 13 | Leheska Farms Inc | Chamberlain, SD 57325 | $144,505 |
| 14 | James Vanderpol | Platte, SD 57369 | $142,357 |
| 15 | Steven Mairose | Kimball, SD 57355 | $140,532 |
| 16 | Todd Leiferman | Kimball, SD 57355 | $139,678 |
| 17 | Nepodal Land & Cattle Inc | Platte, SD 57369 | $138,149 |
| 18 | Timothy J Pazour | Pukwana, SD 57370 | $136,333 |
| 19 | Roger Randall | Chamberlain, SD 57325 | $132,076 |
| 20 | Brent Leiferman | Kimball, SD 57355 | $131,628 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf