Emergency Conservation Program in Charles Mix County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 251
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Charles Mix County, South Dakota totaled $1,015,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Terry L Svatos | Lake Andes, SD 57356 | $2,250 |
82 | Daniel Thomas Koupal | Dante, SD 57329 | $2,240 |
83 | Merle D Stone | Wagner, SD 57380 | $2,218 |
84 | Pavlis Farms Partnership | Geddes, SD 57342 | $2,178 |
85 | Kenneth L Schulte | Geddes, SD 57342 | $2,158 |
86 | Richard Porter | Platte, SD 57369 | $2,137 |
87 | Carney C Nelson Revocable Living | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $2,130 |
88 | David Lee Dufrain | Geddes, SD 57342 | $2,072 |
89 | Morries Rommen | Platte, SD 57369 | $1,987 |
90 | James Calvin Bultje | Lake Andes, SD 57356 | $1,973 |
91 | Soukup Livestock Farms | Lake Andes, SD 57356 | $1,962 |
92 | Doug Cimpl | Dante, SD 57329 | $1,953 |
93 | Vanderpol Farm Partnership | Platte, SD 57369 | $1,945 |
94 | Larry L Laska | Lake Andes, SD 57356 | $1,894 |
95 | Ann Wagner | Pierre, SD 57501 | $1,853 |
96 | Sylvester Patocka | Lake Andes, SD 57356 | $1,818 |
97 | George E Houska | Wagner, SD 57380 | $1,813 |
98 | Nick Randall Stotz | Lake Andes, SD 57356 | $1,808 |
99 | Melvin Vandenbos | Platte, SD 57369 | $1,800 |
100 | Ronald Wayne Kokesh | Wagner, SD 57380 | $1,715 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”