Emergency Conservation Program in Charles Mix County, South Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 224
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Charles Mix County, South Dakota totaled $689,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Joseph C Fillaus | Avon, SD 57315 | $73,768 |
2 | Dan Cimpl | Wagner, SD 57380 | $60,252 |
3 | Dolores T Kotab Living Trust | Dante, SD 57329 | $33,776 |
4 | Rickey R Hurd | Wagner, SD 57380 | $28,631 |
5 | Fischer Farms | Wagner, SD 57380 | $24,360 |
6 | Reinschmidt Lands LLC | Burbank, SD 57010 | $19,734 |
7 | Eitemiller Farm & Ranch LLC | Armour, SD 57313 | $17,202 |
8 | Bureau Of Indian Affairs | Winnebago, NE 68071 | $16,291 |
9 | Douglas E Kokesh | Wagner, SD 57380 | $15,224 |
10 | Vern E Koupal | Dante, SD 57329 | $15,169 |
11 | Robertson Stock Farm | Wagner, SD 57380 | $14,358 |
12 | 2dotts LLC | Renner, SD 57055 | $11,468 |
13 | Merkwan Family Limited Partnershi | Geddes, SD 57342 | $9,829 |
14 | Ys 1-13460 | Wagner, SD 57380 | $9,683 |
15 | Nachtigal Farms | Platte, SD 57369 | $9,188 |
16 | Platte Hutterian Brethren Inc | Platte, SD 57369 | $7,841 |
17 | Donald Ray Krcil | Dante, SD 57329 | $7,508 |
18 | Richard J Podzimek | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $7,468 |
19 | Lakeview Hutterian Brethren Inc | Lake Andes, SD 57356 | $7,349 |
20 | Jeffrey Alan Podzimek | Armour, SD 57313 | $7,284 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>