Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) in Clay County, South Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 26
Recipients of Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) from farms in Clay County, South Dakota totaled $35,238 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Charles Thomas Stockland | Irene, SD 57037 | $3,388 |
2 | Frank A Stockland | Viborg, SD 57070 | $2,310 |
3 | Logue Partnership | Volin, SD 57072 | $2,191 |
4 | Marc E Landeen | Beresford, SD 57004 | $1,883 |
5 | Kurt Thomas Amundson | Vermillion, SD 57069 | $1,760 |
6 | Samuel T Fischer | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $1,752 |
7 | Larry Dean Erickson | Centerville, SD 57014 | $1,748 |
8 | William F Martin | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $1,735 |
9 | Paul David Jensen | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $1,680 |
10 | Daniel Mike Rederick | Volin, SD 57072 | $1,643 |
11 | Daniel G Sundstrom | Beresford, SD 57004 | $1,572 |
12 | Douglas Dale Christensen | Beresford, SD 57004 | $1,423 |
13 | Donald Ralph Christensen | Beresford, SD 57004 | $1,423 |
14 | Dean Evan Christensen | Beresford, SD 57004 | $1,423 |
15 | Howard Nielsen | Brandon, SD 57005 | $1,388 |
16 | James Edward Nelson | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $1,268 |
17 | Joseph D Logue | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $1,255 |
18 | Willoughby Hall-deceased Jr | Freeman, SD 57029 | $1,133 |
19 | Kendal Magnus Swee | Burbank, SD 57010 | $1,073 |
20 | James Morrison | Wakonda, SD 57073 | $990 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>