Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Davison County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 350
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Davison County, South Dakota totaled $14,263,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Nesheim Farms LLC | Ethan, SD 57334 | $75,109 |
62 | Chipp Gerlach | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $72,761 |
63 | Ronald Deinert | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $69,547 |
64 | Bryan Vogel | Ethan, SD 57334 | $68,206 |
65 | Michael Dean Miiller | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $66,785 |
66 | Robert Deboer - Robert M Deboer Revocable Living T | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $66,249 |
67 | Brian Dodd | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $64,477 |
68 | Mark A Hohn | Ethan, SD 57334 | $63,926 |
69 | William J Mathis | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $63,843 |
70 | Neal Bainbridge | Ethan, SD 57334 | $63,729 |
71 | Charles Francis Goldammer | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $63,469 |
72 | David Louis Nebelsick | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $62,926 |
73 | Joseph Michael Schoenfelder | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $62,489 |
74 | Jay Dean Mueller | Ethan, SD 57334 | $62,459 |
75 | Thomas Jason Bialas | Dimock, SD 57331 | $62,171 |
76 | Wade Robert Strand | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $60,747 |
77 | Randal Lee Rumbolz | Dimock, SD 57331 | $60,327 |
78 | Matthew Lewis Bainbridge | Ethan, SD 57334 | $60,070 |
79 | Jeff P Vermeulen | Letcher, SD 57359 | $56,475 |
80 | Jarod Deinert | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $55,968 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”