Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Davison County, South Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 350
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Davison County, South Dakota totaled $14,263,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Edinger Brothers Partnership | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $621,704 |
| 2 | Millan Farms Partnership | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $371,898 |
| 3 | Jones And Klumb Family Farm LLC | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $305,277 |
| 4 | Benjamin Melvin Klumb | Ethan, SD 57334 | $296,978 |
| 5 | Shannon Gustave Klumb | Ethan, SD 57334 | $274,253 |
| 6 | Jackrabbit Family Pork LLC | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $272,205 |
| 7 | Bradley Scott Greenway | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $263,700 |
| 8 | David John Deinert | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $262,374 |
| 9 | John Lee Wieczorek | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $242,365 |
| 10 | Jane Michelle Goldammer | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $240,426 |
| 11 | Patricia Lou Wieczorek | Chaska, MN 55318 | $236,352 |
| 12 | Lorang Farms & Harvesting | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $215,012 |
| 13 | Hetland Farms Inc | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $214,035 |
| 14 | Circle W Land & Cattl LLC | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $209,216 |
| 15 | Blue Stem Family Farms LLC | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $206,069 |
| 16 | Miiller Land & Cattle LLC | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $192,762 |
| 17 | Jason Gerald Moke | Ethan, SD 57334 | $188,063 |
| 18 | Ryan Charles Storm | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $184,627 |
| 19 | Ivan P Bialas | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $157,876 |
| 20 | Moller Farms Partnership | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $156,578 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf