Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Davison County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 350
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Davison County, South Dakota totaled $14,263,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Charles R Storm | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $28,879 |
122 | James W Helling | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $28,540 |
123 | Darrell Harvard Mueller | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $28,333 |
124 | Victor Lee Wieczorek | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $27,386 |
125 | Hanner Tilberg | Ethan, SD 57334 | $26,336 |
126 | Tom Suhr | Dimock, SD 57331 | $25,656 |
127 | Jeffrey Wayne Gerlach | Stickney, SD 57375 | $24,982 |
128 | Lance Olsen | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $24,644 |
129 | Luke Ryks | Ethan, SD 57334 | $24,542 |
130 | Thomas Laverne Greenway | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $24,533 |
131 | Lincoln Jerome Neugebauer | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $24,304 |
132 | Leslie Wieczorek | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $24,137 |
133 | Lewis Gordon Bainbridge | Ethan, SD 57334 | $23,707 |
134 | Jarod L Klock | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $23,533 |
135 | First Dakota National Bank ** | Blunt, SD 57522 | $23,494 |
136 | Dennis Leland | Mitchell, SD 57301 | $22,414 |
137 | Duane Malde | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $22,000 |
138 | Darin Neugebauer | Dimock, SD 57331 | $21,970 |
139 | Daryl Kreth | Mount Vernon, SD 57363 | $21,951 |
140 | Kelly Neugebauer | Dimock, SD 57331 | $21,917 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”