Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Deuel County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 291
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Deuel County, South Dakota totaled $1,363,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | First Metro Bank ** | Muscle Shoals, AL 35661 | $59,500 |
| 2 | Cbm Land And Cattle LLC | Clear Lake, SD 57226 | $49,547 |
| 3 | David Overby | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $48,944 |
| 4 | Berwald Family Rllp | Toronto, SD 57268 | $41,302 |
| 5 | Mark Kienast | Watertown, SD 57201 | $41,076 |
| 6 | Krause Livestock LLC | Brandt, SD 57218 | $37,110 |
| 7 | Gibson Land & Cattle | Clear Lake, SD 57226 | $36,261 |
| 8 | Champaygn Ranch Inc | Goodwin, SD 57238 | $34,565 |
| 9 | Par Farms Inc | Watertown, SD 57201 | $34,073 |
| 10 | Gregory Lunden | Toronto, SD 57268 | $30,788 |
| 11 | Herbert Hamann | Clear Lake, SD 57226 | $28,871 |
| 12 | Miller Angus Farms | Estelline, SD 57234 | $26,531 |
| 13 | Hanten's Dairy Inc | Goodwin, SD 57238 | $26,523 |
| 14 | Brandt Farms Inc | Clear Lake, SD 57226 | $26,285 |
| 15 | Casey D Magedanz | Revillo, SD 57259 | $21,599 |
| 16 | Homan Farms Inc | Gary, SD 57237 | $18,837 |
| 17 | Jamie R Bauman | Brandt, SD 57218 | $17,519 |
| 18 | Michael Gorder | Estelline, SD 57234 | $17,509 |
| 19 | Lane W Tekrony | Clear Lake, SD 57226 | $16,112 |
| 20 | Lewaine A Krause | Clear Lake, SD 57226 | $15,414 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf