Total Commodity Programs in Dewey County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 164
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Dewey County, South Dakota totaled $631,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Ronnie L Goldade | Timber Lake, SD 57656 | $3,475 |
42 | Alan Ganje | Eagle Butte, SD 57625 | $3,375 |
43 | Kenny Quinn | Timber Lake, SD 57656 | $3,138 |
44 | William Lindskov | Isabel, SD 57633 | $2,985 |
45 | Miles A Long | Timber Lake, SD 57656 | $2,941 |
46 | Robert Ducheneaux | Mobridge, SD 57601 | $2,928 |
47 | Joe Hager | Timber Lake, SD 57656 | $2,891 |
48 | Ivan D Lind | Timber Lake, SD 57656 | $2,795 |
49 | David Lipp | Mobridge, SD 57601 | $2,784 |
50 | Luke Mowrer | Mobridge, SD 57601 | $2,784 |
51 | Doyle Simon | Eagle Butte, SD 57625 | $2,657 |
52 | C & E Rausch Farms Inc | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $2,580 |
53 | Lawrence J Goldade | Timber Lake, SD 57656 | $2,526 |
54 | Kim Peterson | Parade, SD 57625 | $2,516 |
55 | Wade Duncan | Mobridge, SD 57601 | $2,484 |
56 | Tom Aberle | Glencross, SD 57630 | $2,366 |
57 | Jeremy Means | Eagle Butte, SD 57625 | $2,355 |
58 | Roger Long | Timber Lake, SD 57656 | $2,245 |
59 | Larry O Joens | Eagle Butte, SD 57625 | $2,200 |
60 | David Kraft | Timber Lake, SD 57656 | $2,155 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”