Farm Subsidy information
Dewey County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Dewey County, South Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 397
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Dewey County, South Dakota totaled $25,278,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | William Lloyd Yuker | Glencross, SD 57630 | $89,295 |
62 | Gill Red Angus Inc | Timber Lake, SD 57656 | $89,113 |
63 | Adam L Schuchhardt | Dupree, SD 57623 | $88,513 |
64 | Kenneth Robert Joens | Eagle Butte, SD 57625 | $88,499 |
65 | Archie Jerome Hulm | Timber Lake, SD 57656 | $87,663 |
66 | Vernon Louis Martin Jr | Ridgeview, SD 57652 | $87,035 |
67 | Circle S Ranch Inc | Isabel, SD 57633 | $86,719 |
68 | Harold Hulm | Timber Lake, SD 57656 | $86,082 |
69 | James E Murray | Gettysburg, SD 57442 | $83,898 |
70 | Arlyn Lawrence | Mobridge, SD 57601 | $83,878 |
71 | Luke Mowrer | Mobridge, SD 57601 | $83,629 |
72 | Duane C Pearman | Eagle Butte, SD 57625 | $82,796 |
73 | Kim Peterson | Parade, SD 57625 | $82,541 |
74 | Leroy Dubray | Mobridge, SD 57601 | $80,794 |
75 | Pte Hca Ka Inc | Eagle Butte, SD 57625 | $79,908 |
76 | John H Gray | Ridgeview, SD 57652 | $79,439 |
77 | Ron Jensen | Eagle Butte, SD 57625 | $79,318 |
78 | Miles A Long | Timber Lake, SD 57656 | $79,228 |
79 | Kenny Quinn | Timber Lake, SD 57656 | $79,079 |
80 | Randy Alley | Isabel, SD 57633 | $78,491 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”