Farm Subsidy information
Dewey County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Dewey County, South Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,433
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Dewey County, South Dakota totaled $219,313,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Mack & Fannin Partnership | Watertown, SD 57201 | $399,121 |
102 | Arthur E Reichert | Isabel, SD 57633 | $394,764 |
103 | Adam L Schuchhardt | Dupree, SD 57623 | $394,201 |
104 | Jay Jones | Trail City, SD 57657 | $393,209 |
105 | Kevin Joe Hulm | Trail City, SD 57657 | $392,470 |
106 | Arlyn Lawrence | Mobridge, SD 57601 | $388,215 |
107 | Gregg Mowrer | Mobridge, SD 57601 | $387,763 |
108 | Lynn Stradinger | Isabel, SD 57633 | $386,193 |
109 | Daniel Gray | Ridgeview, SD 57652 | $385,090 |
110 | Coffy Enright | Timber Lake, SD 57656 | $383,892 |
111 | Kim D Hollenbeck | Mobridge, SD 57601 | $382,829 |
112 | Miles A Long | Timber Lake, SD 57656 | $369,655 |
113 | Kim Peterson | Parade, SD 57625 | $368,328 |
114 | William Hahne | Trail City, SD 57657 | $365,791 |
115 | Rocklen D Peterson | Winona, MN 55987 | $364,781 |
116 | Francis E Schweitzer | Glencross, SD 57630 | $364,314 |
117 | Kelly Landis | Mobridge, SD 57601 | $362,731 |
118 | Roger Aberle | Mobridge, SD 57601 | $360,403 |
119 | Bochek Stock Farms | Vienna, SD 57271 | $358,312 |
120 | Edward L Anderson | Eagle Butte, SD 57625 | $354,770 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”