Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Grant County, South Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 53
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Grant County, South Dakota totaled $49,640 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Falk Farms Inc | South Shore, SD 57263 | $17,500 |
| 2 | P F Jaquet | Twin Brooks, SD 57269 | $3,000 |
| 3 | Lyle Michael Zirbel | Ortley, SD 57256 | $2,084 |
| 4 | Robert Leigh Lowe | Twin Brooks, SD 57269 | $2,000 |
| 5 | Duane W Steege | Wilmot, SD 57279 | $1,860 |
| 6 | Randy William Busk | Twin Brooks, SD 57269 | $1,500 |
| 7 | Kevin John Krakow | Strandburg, SD 57265 | $1,059 |
| 8 | John E Wohlleber | Watertown, SD 57201 | $1,040 |
| 9 | Jeff S Schmidt | Twin Brooks, SD 57269 | $1,040 |
| 10 | Ervin Wohlleber | South Shore, SD 57263 | $997 |
| 11 | Blooming Valley Grain Farms Inc | Watertown, SD 57201 | $997 |
| 12 | Roger Steuck | Summit, SD 57266 | $918 |
| 13 | Lester E Bronson | Watertown, SD 57201 | $915 |
| 14 | Norman Moldenhauer Estate | Twin Brooks, SD 57269 | $829 |
| 15 | Leslie Eugene Rethke | Milbank, SD 57252 | $797 |
| 16 | Duane E Trapp | Milbank, SD 57252 | $736 |
| 17 | Alan Bergquist | Twin Brooks, SD 57269 | $732 |
| 18 | Lester Arten | Summit, SD 57266 | $700 |
| 19 | Garry Harstad | Revillo, SD 57259 | $695 |
| 20 | Tellus Waddell | Marvin, SD 57251 | $585 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf