Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Jones County, South Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 125
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Jones County, South Dakota totaled $2,322,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sj Dowling Farms Partnership | Draper, SD 57531 | $269,996 |
| 2 | T J Farms Partnership | Pierre, SD 57501 | $118,044 |
| 3 | Charles Michael Baker | Murdo, SD 57559 | $111,474 |
| 4 | Severyn Farms | Draper, SD 57531 | $88,797 |
| 5 | Edk Farms | Murdo, SD 57559 | $75,083 |
| 6 | Scott Philip Mathews | Draper, SD 57531 | $70,901 |
| 7 | Clayton Douglas Miller | Draper, SD 57531 | $67,128 |
| 8 | Rebecca Denise Miller | Draper, SD 57531 | $67,127 |
| 9 | Louder Farms Inc | Draper, SD 57531 | $55,719 |
| 10 | Paul Darcy Patterson | Draper, SD 57531 | $54,045 |
| 11 | Hartland Farms Inc | Ainsworth, NE 69210 | $48,859 |
| 12 | Karen Wyly | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $47,782 |
| 13 | Mack Wyly | Fort Pierre, SD 57532 | $47,782 |
| 14 | Dean William Volmer | Draper, SD 57531 | $43,758 |
| 15 | Troy Clinton Iversen | Murdo, SD 57559 | $43,013 |
| 16 | Robert Fuoss Inc | Draper, SD 57531 | $41,623 |
| 17 | Fuoss Angus Ranch Inc | Draper, SD 57531 | $41,123 |
| 18 | Rankin & Sons Inc | Draper, SD 57531 | $39,139 |
| 19 | Curtis Ray Miller | Draper, SD 57531 | $38,095 |
| 20 | Andrew Robert Rankin | Draper, SD 57531 | $37,480 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf