Total Disaster Programs in Lincoln County, South Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 954
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Lincoln County, South Dakota totaled $9,282,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Enger Farms | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $551,990 |
| 2 | Lyndon Herman Ruyter | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $380,670 |
| 3 | Sherwood James Beek | Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | $264,131 |
| 4 | Andrew James Ruyter | Fairview, SD 57027 | $211,252 |
| 5 | Darwin Albers | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $192,257 |
| 6 | Craig Vernon Andersen | Centerville, SD 57014 | $144,290 |
| 7 | Dwayne Kerwin Pederson | Worthing, SD 57077 | $136,757 |
| 8 | Bill Crevier And Jerry Crevier Pt | Chancellor, SD 57015 | $128,752 |
| 9 | Mark Kendall Kuehl | Canton, SD 57013 | $127,285 |
| 10 | Larry W Poppens | Lennox, SD 57039 | $125,000 |
| 11 | Mark Dahlberg | Beresford, SD 57004 | $123,286 |
| 12 | Dale Alan Geiken | Sioux Falls, SD 57106 | $109,760 |
| 13 | Van Den Top Farms LLC | Canton, SD 57013 | $101,732 |
| 14 | Jason Francis Johnke | Centerville, SD 57014 | $88,318 |
| 15 | Michael Gregory Slack | Harrisburg, SD 57032 | $83,763 |
| 16 | Michael Eugene Poppens | Tea, SD 57064 | $83,040 |
| 17 | Leonard F Block Jr | Canton, SD 57013 | $82,095 |
| 18 | Darwin Allen Dixon | Sioux Falls, SD 57108 | $72,957 |
| 19 | Brian Krell | Tea, SD 57064 | $72,567 |
| 20 | Bradley Scott Smidt | Lennox, SD 57039 | $67,226 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf