Farm Subsidy information
Meade County, South Dakota
Total Subsidies in Meade County, South Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,273
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Meade County, South Dakota totaled $263,788,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Oberlander Farms | New Underwood, SD 57761 | $3,055,888 |
2 | Elm Creek Farms | Sturgis, SD 57785 | $2,911,008 |
3 | Levin Ranch Inc | Sturgis, SD 57785 | $1,623,093 |
4 | Shuck Brothers Inc | Union Center, SD 57787 | $1,535,754 |
5 | Patrick X Trask | Elm Springs, SD 57791 | $1,484,963 |
6 | Jason Reed | Faith, SD 57626 | $1,405,351 |
7 | Henry K Bruch | Sturgis, SD 57785 | $1,400,085 |
8 | Thomas Maxwell | Faith, SD 57626 | $1,320,014 |
9 | Sd Building Authority | Sioux Falls, SD 57117 | $1,312,004 |
10 | Irving Jordan Revocable Trust | Faith, SD 57626 | $1,301,115 |
11 | Samuel G Johnston | Elm Springs, SD 57791 | $1,204,392 |
12 | Blair Brothers LLC | Sturgis, SD 57785 | $1,193,022 |
13 | John J Long | Red Owl, SD 57787 | $1,150,624 |
14 | Grady Matt | New Underwood, SD 57761 | $1,084,880 |
15 | Tom Trask | Elm Springs, SD 57791 | $1,069,357 |
16 | Stanley Matt | Elm Springs, SD 57791 | $1,065,170 |
17 | Travis E Madsen | New Underwood, SD 57761 | $1,039,036 |
18 | James E Madsen | New Underwood, SD 57761 | $1,015,124 |
19 | Marvin D Barber | Enning, SD 57737 | $997,479 |
20 | Chris J Grubl | Sturgis, SD 57785 | $991,133 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>