Market Gains in Roberts County, South Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 247
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Roberts County, South Dakota totaled $3,183,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dewain Joseph Waletich Jr | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $155,148 |
| 2 | Heesch Farms | New Effington, SD 57255 | $153,723 |
| 3 | Paul Robert Hamling | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $75,653 |
| 4 | Paul Eugene Deboer | Corona, SD 57227 | $75,584 |
| 5 | Sherry Alice Deboer | Corona, SD 57227 | $63,257 |
| 6 | Henry Leo Hamling | Sisseton, SD 57262 | $63,076 |
| 7 | Marlo Peters Est | Milbank, SD 57252 | $61,357 |
| 8 | John Peter Ebben | Wilmot, SD 57279 | $56,841 |
| 9 | Sylte Farms | Ipswich, SD 57451 | $55,815 |
| 10 | Ronald Nicholas Lick | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $52,402 |
| 11 | William Fred Koeppe | Claire City, SD 57224 | $51,355 |
| 12 | Donald Nicholas Lick | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $48,847 |
| 13 | Ronald John Lick | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $48,841 |
| 14 | Daniel Alexander Lick | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $48,835 |
| 15 | Widhalm Farms Inc | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $47,456 |
| 16 | James Edward Mc Daniel Estate | New Effington, SD 57255 | $44,449 |
| 17 | Kathleen Marie Mcdaniel | New Effington, SD 57255 | $44,449 |
| 18 | Steven Ross Heesch | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $44,193 |
| 19 | Dennis Eugene Hokanson | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $43,021 |
| 20 | David Mittchell Geurts | Rosholt, SD 57260 | $40,695 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf