Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Spink County, South Dakota, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 526
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Spink County, South Dakota totaled $15,571,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Glendale Hutterian Brethren Inc | Frankfort, SD 57440 | $493,925 |
2 | Camrose Hutterian Brethren Inc | Frankfort, SD 57440 | $487,877 |
3 | Armadale Farms Inc | Mellette, SD 57461 | $478,483 |
4 | Esser Farms Inc | Redfield, SD 57469 | $471,480 |
5 | Hillside Hutterian Brethren | Doland, SD 57436 | $411,084 |
6 | Spink Hutterian Inc | Frankfort, SD 57440 | $386,083 |
7 | Bottum Brothers Partnership | Tulare, SD 57476 | $277,177 |
8 | Jay Steinheuser | Redfield, SD 57469 | $250,000 |
9 | Rachelle Bebo | Redfield, SD 57469 | $250,000 |
10 | Stanley Steinheuser | Tulare, SD 57476 | $250,000 |
11 | Scott Bebo | Redfield, SD 57469 | $250,000 |
12 | A & B Feedlot Ltd | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $250,000 |
13 | Swanson Farms Wd, LLC. | Frankfort, SD 57440 | $231,663 |
14 | Rex Herman Binger | Redfield, SD 57469 | $197,660 |
15 | Masat Inc | Redfield, SD 57469 | $195,080 |
16 | Robert Irwin Meier | Doland, SD 57436 | $191,218 |
17 | Christine Kay Meier | Doland, SD 57436 | $191,218 |
18 | Mendel Farms Partnership | Doland, SD 57436 | $185,553 |
19 | Noethlich Bros | Doland, SD 57436 | $184,836 |
20 | Bixler Farms | Hitchcock, SD 57348 | $182,516 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>