Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Union County, South Dakota, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 464
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Union County, South Dakota totaled $3,210,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Van Ballegooyen Brothers Inc | Hawarden, IA 51023 | $58,765 |
2 | Homestead Farms LLC | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $43,702 |
3 | Frank Raymond Minor | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $36,037 |
4 | Allen James Andrews | Beresford, SD 57004 | $32,243 |
5 | Dene Arthur Doty | Alcester, SD 57001 | $31,516 |
6 | Steven Harold Andrews | Beresford, SD 57004 | $31,470 |
7 | Keiser Enterprises Inc | Beresford, SD 57004 | $31,078 |
8 | Reid Allen Bird | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $30,982 |
9 | Trudeau Farms Inc | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $30,820 |
10 | D&g Chicoine Farms LLC | Jefferson, SD 57038 | $30,804 |
11 | Larry Donald Andrews | Beresford, SD 57004 | $30,645 |
12 | Patrick Vincent Walsh | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $30,509 |
13 | Wevik Enterprises Inc | Beresford, SD 57004 | $29,689 |
14 | Michael Herbert Scott | Alcester, SD 57001 | $29,635 |
15 | David Michael Staum | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $29,511 |
16 | Dwight Merl Fickbohm | Akron, IA 51001 | $28,688 |
17 | Heeren Circle H Fms Inc | Akron, IA 51001 | $28,035 |
18 | Lawrence Stanley Donnelly | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $26,736 |
19 | Adam Holmes Rozell | Elk Point, SD 57025 | $26,657 |
20 | Todd David Larsen | Beresford, SD 57004 | $26,650 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>