Counter Cyclical Program in Cheatham County, Tennessee, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 179
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Cheatham County, Tennessee totaled $78,649 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Davidson/seeley Farms LLC | Adams, TN 37010 | $14,804 |
2 | Phillip H Dawson | White Bluff, TN 37187 | $9,288 |
3 | Bruce Lee Batson Jr | Ashland City, TN 37015 | $8,686 |
4 | Walter Weakley | Clarksville, TN 37043 | $3,142 |
5 | Billie L Bradley | Nashville, TN 37205 | $2,611 |
6 | B L & W Developers | Pleasant View, TN 37146 | $2,447 |
7 | Paul Story | Ashland City, TN 37015 | $2,322 |
8 | Jimmy Story | Ashland City, TN 37015 | $2,322 |
9 | Estel Hagewood | Charlotte, TN 37036 | $2,231 |
10 | John L Borum Jr | Ashland City, TN 37015 | $2,032 |
11 | Fairy P Taylor | Kingston Springs, TN 37082 | $1,251 |
12 | Lester Groves | Charlotte, TN 37036 | $1,183 |
13 | Harmon H Jones Jr | Springfield, TN 37172 | $1,143 |
14 | J Richard Dorris Jr | Kingston Springs, TN 37082 | $974 |
15 | Morris Bidwell | Pleasant View, TN 37146 | $885 |
16 | Randy Chamberlain | Ashland City, TN 37015 | $762 |
17 | Howard Balthrop | Chapmansboro, TN 37035 | $725 |
18 | Betty M Morris | Woodhaven, MI 48183 | $689 |
19 | Gilbert Spurlock | Ashland City, TN 37015 | $664 |
20 | Wade Allen Reed | White Bluff, TN 37187 | $598 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>