Production Flexibility Program in Hardeman County, Tennessee, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 971
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Hardeman County, Tennessee totaled $8,023,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ferguson Farms | Whiteville, TN 38075 | $311,033 |
2 | New Castle Farms | Whiteville, TN 38075 | $198,556 |
3 | Allen C Burroughs | Cordova, TN 38016 | $191,769 |
4 | Robert & Janette Campbell Partner | Somerville, TN 38068 | $164,483 |
5 | Gerald Andrew Shelton | Bolivar, TN 38008 | $155,550 |
6 | Gerald Shelton | Bolivar, TN 38008 | $143,143 |
7 | Gem Mitchell | Bolivar, TN 38008 | $140,945 |
8 | Earl M Smith | Grand Junction, TN 38039 | $139,366 |
9 | Robert W Powell | Hickory Valley, TN 38042 | $138,535 |
10 | Stephen & Lynn Fincher Farms | Halls, TN 38040 | $137,248 |
11 | Lynda Jacobs | Hickory Valley, TN 38042 | $132,199 |
12 | Ruth & Morris Bishop Farms | Whiteville, TN 38075 | $132,106 |
13 | Richard B Lake | Hickory Valley, TN 38042 | $128,792 |
14 | George E Mitchell Jr | Bolivar, TN 38008 | $120,021 |
15 | Stephen Howell | Toone, TN 38381 | $114,310 |
16 | Lawrence E Shearin | Hickory Valley, TN 38042 | $104,829 |
17 | Billy Powell | Hickory Valley, TN 38042 | $101,965 |
18 | Danny Jacobs | Hickory Valley, TN 38042 | $97,369 |
19 | Joe K Mcmahan | Hornsby, TN 38044 | $97,056 |
20 | Deberry & Son | Bolivar, TN 38008 | $95,505 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>